Ce contenu a 20 ans. Merci de lire cette page en gardant son âge et son contexte en tête.
On June 27 2001 at the United Nations, all countries committed themselves to a global funding target of 10 billion dollars per year [[Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS, General Assembly of the United Nations, June 2001]]. The table below lists the countries who should be the main achievers of this target, and most responsible for the current funding crisis.
Country |
Gross Domestic Product (billion USD) |
Share of world GDP (%) |
Fair share of global funding commitment (million USD) |
Actual 2003 funding (million USD) |
2003 funding shortfall (million USD) |
Share of global funding shortfall (%) |
Number of avoidable annual aids deaths (if funding commitment is fulfilled) |
United States |
10 383 |
32,2 |
3 220 |
900 |
2 320 |
43,8 |
1 314 000 |
Japan |
3 993 |
12,4 |
1 240 |
165 |
1 075 |
20,3 |
609 000 |
Germany |
1 984 |
6,1 |
610 |
130 |
480 |
9,1 |
273 000 |
United Kingdom [[It should be noted that the UK government claims to have increased its bilateral aids funding fivefold – from $100 million to $480 million – in the mysteriously short space of 3 mere years, and that this claim remains unsupported by any independent source. In the past 8 months, several British NGOs have put this UK government claim in question (see «UK AIDS aid : An analysis of DFID HIV/AIDS expenditure», ActionAid, November 2003).]] |
1 563 |
4,8 |
480 |
510 |
-30 |
-0,6 |
-18 000 |
France |
1 431 |
4,4 |
440 |
125 |
315 |
5,9 |
177 000 |
Italy |
1 184 |
3,7 |
370 |
95 |
275 |
5,2 |
156 000 |
Canada |
716 |
2,2 |
220 |
50 |
170 |
3,2 |
96 000 |
G7 |
21 256 |
65,8 |
6 580 |
1 975 |
4 605 |
86,9 |
2 607 000 |
Rest of OECD |
5 028 |
15,6 |
1 560 |
525 |
1 035 |
19,5 |
585 000 |
Rest of World |
5 979 |
18,5 |
1 850 |
2 200 |
-350 |
-6,6 |
-198 000 |
World |
32 263 |
100 |
10 000 |
4 700 |
5 300 |
100 |
3 000 000 |
Sources
Documents joints